Dear Jessica Coen...
Dec. 2nd, 2010 10:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dear Jessica Coen,
Are you fucking KIDDING ME? No, seriously? This is it? This is your big apology? One you don't even have the fucking gumption to open to comments? You're coming down on high and telling us hysterical bitches that it's GOOD for us to face the views of rape-apologetic douchebags?
I'm sorry, but that is the biggest load of horse-shit I have ever read in my life. I cannot, for all the world, understand why you try to defend the indefensible. It's not as though the readers at Jezebel are LACKING in exposure to the views of misogynists, rapists, sexists and the down-right clueless. You guys are on the Gawker network after all! There was NO REASON WHATSOEVER, no laudable, right, good, acceptable reason to publish that article.
It was triggering, it was dangerous, it was hurtful and it was DISGUSTING.
Your actions are cynical, cruel, callous and unsympathetic. Congratulations, you threw your readership overboard.
No love,
Napalmnacey.
Are you fucking KIDDING ME? No, seriously? This is it? This is your big apology? One you don't even have the fucking gumption to open to comments? You're coming down on high and telling us hysterical bitches that it's GOOD for us to face the views of rape-apologetic douchebags?
I'm sorry, but that is the biggest load of horse-shit I have ever read in my life. I cannot, for all the world, understand why you try to defend the indefensible. It's not as though the readers at Jezebel are LACKING in exposure to the views of misogynists, rapists, sexists and the down-right clueless. You guys are on the Gawker network after all! There was NO REASON WHATSOEVER, no laudable, right, good, acceptable reason to publish that article.
It was triggering, it was dangerous, it was hurtful and it was DISGUSTING.
Your actions are cynical, cruel, callous and unsympathetic. Congratulations, you threw your readership overboard.
No love,
Napalmnacey.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 03:29 pm (UTC)I didn't have any assault triggers before I read that article, but now I just might! How old was that boy? 16?
"Wanker" hardly seems to do it justice.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 03:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 04:43 pm (UTC)I wasn't aware that we needed to have a debate about whether or not consent ruins the fun of sex, or whether we should call it a "decision" in order to avoid killing the boners of young men studying abroad. In fact, I'm pretty sure the only "debate" required is saying, "no, that's stupid, consent is a decision, you're a douchebag, and you don't know French women as well as you think. P.S. get your hand off my ass." But no, apparently we're just argumentative harpies who won't bother having a reasonable discussion with a sensible, well-spoken young man.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 05:05 pm (UTC)Dammit world, stop being full of assholes.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 05:32 pm (UTC)UGH.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 05:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 07:39 pm (UTC)Now, I would generally think it's good to have an idea of how some rape apologists think in order to combat that type of thinking and finding ways of reasoning with people thinking that way. But there needs to be some sort of reasoning in that thinking. Otherwise we're just reading hurtful bullshit from someone we wouldn't have been able to reason with regardless, unless we learn illogical logic.
I would get a drink after reading this, but I have to be a peak performance driver tomorrow if I want to make it to my brother's place alive. Will settle for pancakes.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-02 07:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-03 07:07 am (UTC)