logansrogue: (What? Fuck off!)
[personal profile] logansrogue
Dear Jessica Coen,

Are you fucking KIDDING ME? No, seriously? This is it? This is your big apology? One you don't even have the fucking gumption to open to comments? You're coming down on high and telling us hysterical bitches that it's GOOD for us to face the views of rape-apologetic douchebags?

I'm sorry, but that is the biggest load of horse-shit I have ever read in my life. I cannot, for all the world, understand why you try to defend the indefensible. It's not as though the readers at Jezebel are LACKING in exposure to the views of misogynists, rapists, sexists and the down-right clueless. You guys are on the Gawker network after all! There was NO REASON WHATSOEVER, no laudable, right, good, acceptable reason to publish that article.

It was triggering, it was dangerous, it was hurtful and it was DISGUSTING.

Your actions are cynical, cruel, callous and unsympathetic. Congratulations, you threw your readership overboard.

No love,
Napalmnacey.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 03:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephbg.livejournal.com
*splutter*

I didn't have any assault triggers before I read that article, but now I just might! How old was that boy? 16?

"Wanker" hardly seems to do it justice.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] logansrogue.livejournal.com
I don't even fucking know, man. And I have to get my arse into gear with the bloody overdue print. I'm so sorry about that. Having a new boyfriend threw me a totally new mental loop that I hadn't anticipated, it's taken all my energy just to sort of understand myself in a new context of having a man that I'm seeing on an ongoing basis. It's been a bit terrifying, really! But, no excuses, I have to get shit done.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 04:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meleth.livejournal.com
Looking purely at what gets posted on Jezebel, it's often a one-sided debate

I wasn't aware that we needed to have a debate about whether or not consent ruins the fun of sex, or whether we should call it a "decision" in order to avoid killing the boners of young men studying abroad. In fact, I'm pretty sure the only "debate" required is saying, "no, that's stupid, consent is a decision, you're a douchebag, and you don't know French women as well as you think. P.S. get your hand off my ass." But no, apparently we're just argumentative harpies who won't bother having a reasonable discussion with a sensible, well-spoken young man.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simply-shipping.livejournal.com
I've kind of given up on Jezebel, to be honest. :/ But yeah, that apology? Made of fail. The essay? Even more fail.

Dammit world, stop being full of assholes.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simply-shipping.livejournal.com
Also, <3 your Eddie Izzard icon.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] starfyre01.livejournal.com
I think this icon says it all.

UGH.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 05:47 pm (UTC)
ext_6373: A swan and a ballerina from an old children's book about ballet, captioned SWAN! (Default)
From: [identity profile] annlarimer.livejournal.com
Yes. You need to balance feminism with groping, Jezebel, or people will think you have some sort of anti-assault bias.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shantari.livejournal.com
Read the guy's article expecting something somewhat in the grey zone, where it isn't immidiately obvious what kind of shit it's about, but damn! Just fucking damn! What was that guy thinking? What was she thinking putting it up? What the fucking hell? Did the guy lose his sarcasm detector when that woman friend of his "suggested" getting his intended drunk? Because I can easily imagine someone giving that as toungue-in-cheek advice, and the way he described it I would have assumed she figured he needed drinking to loosen up and fit with the French way of courting. And he seemed to basically miss the point big time that they were courting, agressively so yes, but consent didn't seem to be a non-issue for the "empowered" French women and I don't see how calling it something else is any better, and I could go on forever with every logic fail that guy committed! It's just one huge fest of jumping to the conclusions he likes the best and praising what he sees of a culture he doesn't seem to understand.

Now, I would generally think it's good to have an idea of how some rape apologists think in order to combat that type of thinking and finding ways of reasoning with people thinking that way. But there needs to be some sort of reasoning in that thinking. Otherwise we're just reading hurtful bullshit from someone we wouldn't have been able to reason with regardless, unless we learn illogical logic.

I would get a drink after reading this, but I have to be a peak performance driver tomorrow if I want to make it to my brother's place alive. Will settle for pancakes.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-02 07:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hotclaws.livejournal.com
what a piece of monkey poo

(no subject)

Date: 2010-12-03 07:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] melalucci.livejournal.com
::applauds!!::

Profile

logansrogue: (Default)
logansrogue

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags