Youtube: Hive of Scum and Villainy.
Oct. 9th, 2009 10:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
logansrogueBut I do have fun there sometimes. KGB have a detestible ad and one dear soul said it was "sexploitation".
Said one wag: wow. can you say "faggot"? totally gay...
Any dude who finds this chick in her bra and panties "unnecessary" has got to be gay...
Shit, I'd PAY to sniff the skidmarks on her panties...
Replied I: Aren't you a sterling example of humanity?
Said he: Yeah, actually I am....So come over and suck my cock..
I reply: If I wanted to suck on something tiny and salty, I'd buy a packet of peanuts, sugar. It would last longer than thirty seconds, too.
In direct reply to our politically correct and aware person who was worried about "sexploitation", I said in jest:
How dare you come in here with your logic and treating women like people, ya faggit?!
Replied Mr. Congeniality:
Fuck you dyke....I know you like seeing chicks in panties, probably makes you wet and makes you want to lick even more pussy...
BTW, learn to spell...Bitch...
To which I said:
Re: spelling error. I was merely impersonating the likes of you. It's called parody, good sir.
Re: My sexuality. It'll be one of life's little mysteries for you. Needless to say, I think it is possible to enjoy the sight of women in panties without reducing them to sex objects. Until you learn that little difference, the real meaning of manhood shall elude you.
It's like shooting fish in a barrel, really.
Said one wag: wow. can you say "faggot"? totally gay...
Any dude who finds this chick in her bra and panties "unnecessary" has got to be gay...
Shit, I'd PAY to sniff the skidmarks on her panties...
Replied I: Aren't you a sterling example of humanity?
Said he: Yeah, actually I am....So come over and suck my cock..
I reply: If I wanted to suck on something tiny and salty, I'd buy a packet of peanuts, sugar. It would last longer than thirty seconds, too.
In direct reply to our politically correct and aware person who was worried about "sexploitation", I said in jest:
How dare you come in here with your logic and treating women like people, ya faggit?!
Replied Mr. Congeniality:
Fuck you dyke....I know you like seeing chicks in panties, probably makes you wet and makes you want to lick even more pussy...
BTW, learn to spell...Bitch...
To which I said:
Re: spelling error. I was merely impersonating the likes of you. It's called parody, good sir.
Re: My sexuality. It'll be one of life's little mysteries for you. Needless to say, I think it is possible to enjoy the sight of women in panties without reducing them to sex objects. Until you learn that little difference, the real meaning of manhood shall elude you.
It's like shooting fish in a barrel, really.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-09 02:37 pm (UTC)THAT BEING SAID not only are the ads really dumb, I don't understand what the purpose of the company is. Do people not know how to use Google? Even my crappy little phone can get Google on it's browser.
Also the guy you're arguing with seems like the type of guy who HAS to sexualize women because he can't see them any other way, what with only ever seeing tits in porn his entire life. What a looooooser!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-09 02:48 pm (UTC)People are paying for Google. It's insane.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-09 02:48 pm (UTC)