If its the video where she is asked what 'Mr Clinton' thinks, that was actually a translation error. The reporter actually was asking what Obama thought (a much more reasonable question), but it confused in the translation by the translator apparently.
Or at least that's what I read earlier in the day.
Something a bit more in depth and looking at the situation in the Congo and why it would elicit that response from her. I think, considering all that's going on over there, it was a seriously ballsy move on her part.
In all seriousness, her response was the correct response. It doesn't matter whatever the hell the current president or what her husband thinks about the freeing of those two reporters. She is the Secretary of State, not them. It was complete and utter disregard of her - both from a professional and a personal perspective.
Gah. I'm in a grumpy mood - and quite frankly, the dickwads who run the MSM should be all kicked out, :-P~~~~
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 11:55 am (UTC)Or at least that's what I read earlier in the day.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 12:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 06:38 pm (UTC)http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2009/08/good-diplomacy-dismissed-as-clintons.html
She had reason to respond like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 06:39 pm (UTC)Something a bit more in depth and looking at the situation in the Congo and why it would elicit that response from her. I think, considering all that's going on over there, it was a seriously ballsy move on her part.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-11 10:06 pm (UTC)Gah. I'm in a grumpy mood - and quite frankly, the dickwads who run the MSM should be all kicked out, :-P~~~~
(no subject)
Date: 2009-08-12 06:54 am (UTC)